Virginia Del. Robert G. Marshall calls the kettle black

Thorne-Begland was the only one of more than three dozen judicial nominees — including 10 others from the Richmond region — who was not elected to a judgeship following a marathon legislative session dominated by review of amendments to the two-year state budget proposed by Gov. Bob McDonnell.

And how, you may wonder, is Mr. Thorne-Begland uniquely unqualified among nominees for a judgeship in Virginia?

A number of conservative House Republicans with military backgrounds questioned Thorne-Begland’s decision to speak publicly about his sexual orientation while he was in the military and subject to its code of conduct.

“For me it’s not not about fear and bigotry and ignorance and so forth,” said  Del. L. Scott Lingamfelter, R-Prince William. “It is very definitely about duty.”

In an email blast to supporters late last week, the Christian conservative Family Foundation questioned Thorne-Begland’s fitness for the bench given his support for gay marriage, which is not legal in Virginia. Thorne-Begland and his partner, Michael, live together and are raising twins.

Marshall, too had charged that Thorne-Begland pursued an “aggressive activist homosexual agenda.”

“Duty” here is code for “don’t make us uncomfortable.”

We can’t have a new judge who spoke out against DADT at the expense of his military career and who now raises twins openly with his partner. If you’re gay and pursuing a legal/judicial career in Virginia, you’d best stay in the closet.

But his nomination came under fire late last week, as the Family Foundation and Del. Robert G. Marshall, R-Prince William, stoked fears that the 45-year-old attorney would allow his sexual orientation to influence his judicial decisions.

If you’re queer, and you might make judicial decisions that make life suck less for queer people, then according to Del. Marshall you are allowing your sexual orientation to influence your judicial decisions, and to him that is unacceptable. However, Del. Marshall doesn’t seem to consider that some might accuse him of allowing his bigotry to influence his legislative decisions, and in ways that would do a lot more damage than any “aggressive activist homosexual agenda.” Amanda Marcotte has more of his nonsense:

“Marriage is between one man and one woman, and the the applicant has represented himself in public in a relationship that we don’t recognize in Virginia,” Marshall said in an interview with WRIC, the ABC affiliate in Richmond.

Of course he’s just making shit up as he goes along. We don’t see him applying this “relationship propriety test” to people who are against marriage equality. I think he’s freaking out over the fact that support for civil marriage equality is shooting up like a rocket all over the country, and Tracy Thorne-Begland is a handy target for his anxiety.

, , ,

  1. #1 by A Bi-Submissive's Journey in the Vanilla World on May 16, 2012 - 12:14 AM

    This is so ridiculous; it’s obvious that Marshall is using his bigoted ideology that his sexual orientation is superior, in an effort to discriminate against other residents of the commonwealth …..smdh!

    • #2 by alysonmiers on May 16, 2012 - 2:47 PM

      Sexual orientation is only a thing if you’re in the minority. To people like Marshall, heterosexuality isn’t an orientation, it’s just normal.

  2. #3 by Tracey on May 16, 2012 - 11:55 AM

    I’ve nominated you for the Beautiful Blogger award! Info here: http://traceybaptiste.wordpress.com/2012/05/16/blogger-awards/

  3. #4 by Karen Berthine on May 16, 2012 - 2:23 PM

    It’s always interesting that no one is worried that a judge who has a “traditional” marital arrangement (e.g., married to a woman who’s a stay-at-home mom) will allow his biases to influence decisions. Hmmm.

    • #5 by alysonmiers on May 16, 2012 - 2:46 PM

      Oh, you see, that kind of bias doesn’t count, because everyone is supposed to be like that anyway.

      • #6 by Karen Berthine on May 16, 2012 - 3:08 PM

        I would guess that people would say that “traditional” judge isn’t biased …

        • #7 by A Bi-Submissive's Journey in the Vanilla World on May 16, 2012 - 3:14 PM

          It’s funny how easily people forget the recent past; it was only forty-five years ago that interracial marriage became legal (although,it really should be called interr-complection marriage because unless my husband’s an awesome illustionist and I don’t know it, we both appear to be of the human race).

        • #8 by Karen Berthine on May 16, 2012 - 3:23 PM

          Yes and no … before Loving vs. Virginia blacks could marry other minorities; but blacks could not marry white (and vice-versa). Julie Novkov – a political science professor at SUNY Albany, wrote a great book on miscegenation laws in the U.S. if you want a little extra reading! :)

        • #9 by A Bi-Submissive's Journey in the Vanilla World on May 16, 2012 - 7:04 PM

          My husband is as white as this comment area….but when we got married we not only did some of the traditional things, but we also did what the slaves did to signify marriage….

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 147 other followers

%d bloggers like this: